Ranger Ins. Co. v. Speck

JUST WHO HAS THE RIGHT TO REHAB ANYWAY? THE INVALIDITY OF SBWC RULE 200.2

I am convinced that rehabilitation services in non-catastrophic cases (which has historically been broadly defined to include case management)[1] should continue to be voluntary under O.C.G.A. §34-9-200.1(h) so that case management in any form can be terminated by the injured worker, and the right of the injured cannot lawfully be diminished by SBWC 200.2. SBWC…

Read More